Hampshire County Council (25 021 435)

Category : Transport and highways > Highway repair and maintenance

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 28 Apr 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about management of repairs to a local road. This is because it is reasonable to expect Mr X to go to court, and the court is better placed to consider the matter.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about the Council’s management of repairs to a local road. He also complains about complaint handling.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained to the Council about the lack of repairs to a local road. The Council said it assessed the issues and decided they were not safety defects, so it was not a priority. It said it would continue to regularly monitor the road and told Mr X how to report any worsening of the road.
  2. If Mr X considers that the Council is failing to maintain a highway it is responsible for, he can apply to the magistrates’ court for an order under section 56 of the Highways Act 1980. This order requires the highways authority to carry out the work needed to the highway.
  3. There might be some cost to court action. However, that does not mean it is unreasonable. There is often financial assistance to those on a low income from HM Courts and Tribunal Service. It is therefore reasonable to expect Mr X to use his right to go to court about this matter.
  4. Further, unlike the Ombudsman, the court can order the Council to do the required work, so it is better placed than us to consider the complaint. We will therefore not investigate.
  5. Mr X has complained about complaint handling. It is not a good use of public resources to investigate complaints about complaint procedures if we are unable to deal with the substantive issue.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it is reasonable to expect Mr X to go to court about the matter and the court is better placed to consider the complaint.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings