Torbay Council (25 016 718)

Category : Transport and highways > Highway repair and maintenance

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 25 Nov 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint that her car was damaged by a pothole. This is because it is reasonable for Mrs X to pursue the matter at court.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains the Council failed to properly maintain a road which resulted in her vehicle being damaged by a pothole. She wants the Council to reimburse the repair costs and repair the road.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The Act says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Section 41 of the Highways Act 1980 places a duty on highway authorities to maintain public highways. Highway authorities are expected to routinely monitor the state of highways for which they are responsible and to carry out repairs where necessary.
  2. Mrs X says the Council failed to properly maintain the road and this resulted in damage to her car. She made a claim for compensation to the Council, which the Council considered, but it did not accept that it is liable for the damage.
  3. We cannot decide whether the Council has complied with its duty under Section 41 of the Highways Act and have no powers to enforce an award of damages. Any dispute about the Council’s liability for the damage is for the courts. Mrs X may pursue her claim by taking the Council to court and I have seen nothing to show it would be unreasonable to expect her to do so. For these reasons, we will not investigate this complaint.
  4. Mrs X is also unhappy with the way the Council dealt with her complaint. But it is not a good use of public resources to look at the Council’s complaints handling if we are not going to look at the substantive issue complained about. We will not therefore investigate this issue separately.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because it is reasonable for her to pursue her expenses claim by taking the Council to court.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings