Cheshire East Council (25 011 782)

Category : Transport and highways > Highway repair and maintenance

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 27 Nov 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint that his car was damaged by a poorly repaired section of a road. This is because it would be reasonable for Mr X to take the matter to court.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains his car was damaged on a section of a road that was poorly repaired by the Council. Mr X complains about the handling of his compensation claim by the organisation that manages claims on behalf of the Council. He complains about the Council’s refusal to address his complaint about this.
  2. Mr X would like the Council to reimburse the £300 he spent on repairs to his car and review the handling of his claim and complaint.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Our role is to consider complaints of administrative fault. We cannot decide liability in complaints about damage to property. Mr X contacted the Council’s claims handler and received a decision about his claim. We cannot intervene in that process. Mr X may start legal action for any continuing dispute about liability and a claim for compensation. It is reasonable to expect Mr X to do this because the courts are the appropriate body to decide if the Council was responsible for the accident and, if so, what level of compensation should be made. These are judgements that only insurers or the courts can make.
  2. Mr X complains about the handling of his claim and complaint. But, it is not normally a good use of our limited resources to investigate an organisation’s handling of a compensation claim or complaint alone, if we are not investigating the substantive matter. We will not investigate this part of the complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint that his car was damaged by a poorly repaired section of a road. This is because it would be reasonable for Mr X to take the matter to court.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings