East Sussex County Council (25 007 685)

Category : Transport and highways > Highway repair and maintenance

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 10 Nov 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about blocked drains on the highway. The court is better placed to consider the complaint, and it is reasonable to expect Mr X to exercise his right to go to court.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council have failed to maintain drainage on a highway outside his home.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X reported surface flooding on the road outside his home. He says this is caused by blocked drains the Council have not been properly maintaining.
  2. The Council say they have arranged for the drains to be inspected and cleared. They say the road is inspected regularly.
  3. As a local highways authority, it is expected the Council will routinely monitor the state of highways and carry out repairs where necessary. But, the level of maintenance, frequency of inspection, and threshold for repair is not set out in law and is open to interpretation. The Ombudsman cannot tell the Council how often it should carry out highway maintenance.
  4. Section 41 of the Highways Act 1980 places a duty on highway authorities to maintain public highways. Highway authorities are expected to routinely monitor the state of highways for which they are responsible and to carry out repairs where necessary. This includes maintaining drainage to prevent the carriageway from being obstructed by standing water.
  5. If a person considers a highways authority has failed to maintain a highway it is responsible for, the person affected can apply to the magistrates court for an order to be made under section 56 of the Highways Act 1980. This order requires the highways authority to carry out the work needed to the highway.
  6. If the highways authority does not respond in time or does not accept it is responsible for maintaining the road, the person may apply to the crown court for such an order.
  7. It is open to Mr X to use this process to try to get the Council to repair drainage to the highway.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr’s complaint. The court is better placed to consider the complaint, and it is reasonable to expect Mr X to exercise his right to go to court.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings