Kent County Council (25 006 411)

Category : Transport and highways > Highway repair and maintenance

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 01 Jul 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Dr B’s complaint that the Council is not taking action about part of the highway which has become muddy. This is because Dr B has not suffered a serious or significant injustice which would justify an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Dr B says the Council is failing to put right an area of the highway in front of a graveyard which is always muddy in the winter and after rain. Dr B says the Council’s assessment of this issue was flawed because the inspection took place in summer when it was dry. Dr B says he has to walk through this muddy area when walking his dogs. Dr B would like the Council to lay tarmac in this area to put right this problem.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide:
  • any fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained, or
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

  1. This means we will normally only investigate a complaint where the complainant has suffered serious loss, harm, or distress as a direct result of faults or failures. We will not normally investigate a complaint where the alleged loss or injustice is not a serious or significant matter.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Dr B.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. I find Dr B has not suffered a serious or significant injustice as a result of the alleged fault by the Council which would justify public money being spent on an investigation by the Ombudsman.
  2. So, we will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Dr B’s complaint because he has not suffered a serious or significant injustice which would justify an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings