Bury Metropolitan Borough Council (25 003 654)

Category : Transport and highways > Highway repair and maintenance

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 29 May 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint that the Council has refused to move a street name sign which is in the wrong position. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mr B complains the Council has refused to move a street name sign for an adjoining street which is directly in front of his property. Mr B says the location of this sign causes confusion and visitors have difficulty locating his property. Mr B says the Council could easily resolve this problem by moving the sign slightly further down the street.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr B and have viewed this location on Google Streetview.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council has decided not to move this sign. The Council says this sign must be located at the entrance to the adjoining street to denote the start of the street. The Council says to move this sign further along the street would make it less conspicuous and so less effective.
  2. We will not investigate this complaint. The Council has considered Mr B’s request and has explained its decision. It is not our role to tell the Council it should make a different decision on this issue. So, an investigation is not justified.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings