North Yorkshire Council (24 022 903)

Category : Transport and highways > Highway repair and maintenance

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 13 May 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about damage caused to her car by a pothole on a road maintained by the Council. This is because it is reasonable for Miss X to take the matter to the Council’s insurers and, ultimately, the courts.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complained about damage caused to her car by a pothole in the Council’s area. Miss X said the matter caused her distress.
  2. Miss X wants the Council to reimburse her costs associated with fixing her car.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because Miss X’s complaint is mainly that the Council has been negligent, which resulted in damage to her car.
  2. Deciding about whether an organisation has been negligent usually involves looking rigorously, and in a structured way, at evidence as only the court can to make its findings. In addition, only a court can decide if an organisation has been negligent and so should pay damages. We cannot recommend actions or payments that ‘punish’ the Council.
  3. Because the Ombudsman cannot decide whether the Council has been negligent and has no powers to enforce an award of damages, we expect someone in Miss X’s position to seek a remedy through the Council’s insurers and, ultimately, the courts.
  4. If Miss X’s claim is rejected by the insurers, it is open to Miss X to take the matter to court. I do not consider there is any exceptional reason why Miss X cannot do this and so we will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because it is reasonable to take the matter to the Council’s insurers and, ultimately, the courts.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings