Salford City Council (24 009 749)

Category : Transport and highways > Highway repair and maintenance

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 03 Oct 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about land maintenance as there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council and it is unlikely we could achieve the outcome the complainant seeks.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council refuses to maintain a strip of land next to his property which is overgrown. Mr X considers it is the Council’s responsibility to do this.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating; or we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council previously cut back overgrowing vegetation on a strip of land near to a property Mr X owns. Following a further request from Mr X for the Council to do this, it has refused saying that it is not the landowner, and that it is the landowner’s responsibility to do this.
  2. While I recognise Mr X’s frustration at being told this, he has not provided evidence of the Council being at fault in this regard. If the Council is not the landowner, then it does not fall upon it to maintain the land. An investigation by us would not therefore achieve the outcome Mr X seeks.
  3. For these reasons, we will not investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council and it is unlikely we could achieve the outcome Mr X seeks.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings