Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council (24 009 609)

Category : Transport and highways > Highway repair and maintenance

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 23 Sep 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs B’s complaint that she suffered injuries due to the Council’s failure to maintain a pavement it is responsible for. This is because it is reasonable for Mrs B to pursue her compensation claim by taking the Council to court.

The complaint

  1. Mrs B says she suffered significant injuries and needed an operation after tripping on a raised paving slab which the Council had failed to repair. Mrs B complains the Council has wrongly refused her compensation claim for the injuries she suffered. Mrs B would like the Council to pay her compensation claim and fix the pavement.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The Act says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs B.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs B complains she tripped and suffered injuries because of the Council’s failure to maintain a pavement. So, in effect, Mrs B complains her injuries were the result of negligence by the Council.
  2. We take the view negligence claims are best decided by an organisation’s insurers, and if needed, the courts.
  3. Mrs B has received the Council’s decision in response to her claim. Mrs B may now pursue her claim by taking the Council to court.
  4. Deciding whether an organisation has been negligent usually involves looking rigorously, and in a structured way at evidence as only the court can to make its findings.
  5. In addition, only a court can decide if an organisation has been negligent and so should pay damages. We cannot recommend actions or payments that ‘punish’ the organisation and cannot order a party to pay damages.
  6. Because of the seriousness of the injuries suffered by Mrs B, I find it is reasonable and proportionate for Mrs B to take the Council to court.
  7. The fee for making a claim is relatively modest and Mrs B may ask for the fee to be reimbursed if her claim is successful. Help with fees is also available for people on a low income.
  8. So, we will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs B’s complaint because it is reasonable for her to take the Council to court.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings