London Borough of Bromley (24 005 331)

Category : Transport and highways > Highway repair and maintenance

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 24 Jul 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council’s decision to refuse her claim for damages after her car hit a pothole. This is because this is a complaint about negligence which is a legal matter for the courts to consider and decide.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Mrs X, complains the Council has refused her claim for damages after her car hit a pothole. When Mrs X reported the pothole she found it had been reported by someone else four hours before her car hit it. Mrs X says the Council should have acted on the first report sooner which would have prevented her from hitting the pothole. However, the Council says it was repaired within a reasonable timeframe and refused her claim.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  3. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X submitted a claim for damages after her tyre was damaged by hitting a pothole.
  2. The Council has considered her claim. It has denied liability.
  3. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint, This is because this is a complaint about negligence which is a legal matter for the courts to consider and decide. We cannot decide a negligence claim, make a ruling on whether Mrs X’s losses were caused by the Council’s negligence or award damages. Only the courts can make such a ruling and, if so, decide whether any damages Mrs X seeks should be awarded and at what level.
  4. It is reasonable to expect Mrs X to use her right to pursue her claim further in the courts if she considers the Council to be liable for the damage to her car. Making a claim in the small claims court is a simple, accessible and low cost process with fees set on a sliding scale depending on the level of the monetary claim. Those on a low income can apply for help with the fees.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because it is about negligence which is a legal matter for the courts to consider and decide.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings