East Sussex County Council (23 005 711)

Category : Transport and highways > Highway repair and maintenance

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 08 Aug 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about damage caused by a pothole. The courts are best placed to deal with negligence claims, and there is not a good reason for us to consider the matter instead.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complained about damage caused by a pothole. She says this has caused her a £390 loss, stress and damage to her car. She says the Council has refused to accept liability and it has delayed responding to her claim. She wants it to pay her £390.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Complaints about damage caused by potholes are generally outside the Ombudsman’s jurisdiction. This is because these are really negligence claims. Only a court can decide whether:
    • the Council should have dealt with the problem before it caused the complainant harm;
    • the complainant should have taken steps to avoid the harm;
    • the Council is liable to pay damages for any loss or injury.
  2. Fees for the small claims court are on a sliding scale dependent on the amount being sought, and it is not necessary to pay for legal representation. For people on a low income or certain benefits, the fees may be waived. Where the person is successful in their claim, they can ask the court to order the other party to pay their costs.
  3. There is not a reason in this case for the Ombudsman to consider the matter instead of the courts. It is reasonable, therefore, for Mrs X to use the court process available to her.
  4. We also will not investigate the delay in the Council considering Mrs X’s claim, which the Council does not dispute. We expect councils to respond appropriately to any claims but would not normally investigate a complaint that it had not done so, as the underlying issue is a matter for the courts. Mrs X has the option of waiting for the Council’s response, or lodging a claim in court immediately.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because it is a matter for the courts.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings