Oxfordshire County Council (21 014 943)

Category : Transport and highways > Highway repair and maintenance

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 10 Feb 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not exercise discretion to investigate this complaint about highway layouts approved by the Council for adoption. This was received outside the normal 12-month period for investigating complaints. There is no evidence to suggest that Mr X could not have complained to us sooner.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained about the Council’s use of an inappropriate design guide for a road junction and visibility splays when it gave highways advice on a planning approval for a housing development in 2014. He is concerned that the junction visibility may be unsatisfactory and that there is no clarity about who will be responsible for maintaining vegetation alongside the splays where they meet private boundaries.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X says the Council may have used the wrong design guide when it provided highway approval as a statutory undertaker for a planning application in 2014. He says that this may have resulted in the visibility splays for a junction being given less maintenance of vegetation which would affect traffic safety. He is also concerned about who would be responsible for maintaining hedges on the boundary of the visibility splays.
  2. Mr X says he first raised the matter with the Council in 2017 and made a formal complaint in September 2018.
  3. We will not exercise discretion to consider this matter now. He has expressed dissatisfaction with the Council’s responses over a number of years and I have seen no evidence to suggest that he could not have complained to us sooner.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not exercise discretion to investigate this complaint about highway layouts approved by the Council for adoption. This was received outside the normal 12-month period for investigating complaints. There is no evidence to suggest that Mr X could not have complained to us sooner.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings