East Sussex County Council (20 008 400)

Category : Transport and highways > Highway repair and maintenance

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 02 Dec 2020

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint the Council has failed to compensate her following a fall she says was due to the condition of the public highway. This is because the Ombudsman cannot establish liability in negligence claims, and it is reasonable for Mrs X to use the legal remedy available to her.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains she fell over due to the condition of the public highway. Mrs X received medical treatment following the fall. Mrs X wants the Council to pay compensation.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered Mrs X’s complaint to the Ombudsman and the information she provided. I also gave Mrs X the opportunity to comment on a draft statement before reaching a final decision on her complaint.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mrs X says the condition of the public highway led to her falling over. Mrs X suffered facial injuries and damaged her glasses. Mrs X wants the Council to pay compensation. The Council has so far refused Mrs X’s claim. It says the highway had been regularly inspected and no defects requiring intervention had been found.
  2. The role of the Ombudsman is to look for administrative fault. But at the heart of Mrs X’s complaint is an allegation of negligence against the Council, which she says led to her falling over. Such issues are for the Council’s insurers and, ultimately, for the courts.
  3. The Council’s insurers have rejected Mrs X’s claim and it is now open to her to take the matter to court. I consider it would be reasonable for her to do so. This is because adjudication on questions of negligence usually involves making decisions on contested questions of fact and law. These need the more rigorous and structured procedures of civil litigation for their proper determination. Only a court can determine if the Council has been negligent. It can decide if the Council should pay damages to Mrs X, and what other actions, if any, the Council should take. These are not questions the Ombudsman can decide.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. The Ombudsman will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint. This is because it is reasonable for Mrs X to use the legal remedy available to her.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings