West Sussex County Council (19 010 140)

Category : Transport and highways > Highway repair and maintenance

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 30 Oct 2019

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about injuries he sustained after tripping over a stopcock cover in the street. The Ombudsman cannot achieve the outcome Mr X seeks which is compensation for his injuries.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I shall call Mr X, seeks compensation after falling over a stopcock cover in the street.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we believe it is unlikely further investigation will lead to a different outcome (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered what Mr X said in his complaint.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mr X tripped over a stopcock cover in the street and seeks compensation. The stopcock cover is owned by a water company. It has denied liability for Mr X’s accident explaining that the Council, who has a duty to carry out inspections of the street (highway), did not notify it of any defects.
  2. The Council has advised Mr X it adhered to its highway maintenance programme and that he needs to pursue his claim with the water company.

Analysis

  1. The Ombudsman has no jurisdiction to investigate the water company as it is not a body within our jurisdiction.
  2. We could not in any case determine whether it is liable to pay compensation for Mr X’s injuries as only the courts can do this. There is a simple procedure open to anyone to make a money claim through the courts or Mr X could consider using a ‘no win no fee’ solicitor to pursue his claim.
  3. We would not investigate the Council’s involvement in this matter as the appropriate route for Mr X to achieve the outcome he seeks is via legal action. We cannot achieve Mr X’s desired outcome of a compensation award.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. My decision is that the Ombudsman should not investigate this complaint. This is because we cannot achieve the outcome Mr X seeks.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings