Northamptonshire County Council (19 006 632)

Category : Transport and highways > Highway repair and maintenance

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 11 Sep 2019

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s gritting vehicle damaging his car paintwork. Mr X’s complaint is a claim that the Council has been negligent. That is a matter for the courts to decide. The Ombudsman cannot make decisions on such legal matters.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council used salt and grit on the roads which damaged his car paintwork. Mr X considers this was due to the Council using the wrong type of salt. He wants the Council to pay for the damage the salt caused.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. As part of my assessment I have:
    • considered the complaint and the documents provided by Mr X;
    • issued a draft decision, inviting Mr X to reply.

Back to top

What I found

  1. In February 2019, a Council gritting lorry sprayed Mr X’s car with salt. On washing his car a few days later, Mr X found the salt had marked the paintwork, leaving marks which would not come off. Mr X complained to the Council a few days later. He has not received a substantive response to his complaint.
  2. Mr X’s complaint amounts to an allegation the Council or its contractor was negligent by using salt which damaged his car. Only a court can decide on issues of negligence and make an award of damages. The Ombudsman cannot make decisions on negligence. So I consider it would be reasonable to expect Mr X to seek a remedy in court. He may wish to seek legal advice before taking that route.
  3. It is unfortunate the Council has not replied substantively to Mr X’s complaint. But the Ombudsman will not investigate a council’s complaint process in isolation, when he is not investigating the core complaint issue.

Final decision

  1. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint. This is because:
    • Mr X’s complaint is an allegation of Council negligence causing damage to his car. The appropriate route for Mr X to pursue the matter is in the courts.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings