Decision search


What's this ?
  • Organisation
  • Decision type

  • Reference number
  • Date range

     

  • Sort Results

Show advanced search

Your search has 53191 results

  • Oxfordshire County Council (24 013 800)

    Statement Upheld Special educational needs 07-Apr-2025

    Summary: Mrs X complained of the Council’s handling of her child (Y’s) Education Health and Care (EHC) Plan during a phase transfer. This included poor communication and a failure to issue Y’s amended final EHC Plan by 15 February in line with statutory timescales. The Council was at fault for its communication and the three-month delay in issuing Y’s EHC Plan. This caused Mrs X distress, frustration and uncertainty and delayed her appeal rights to the SEND tribunal. The Council has agreed to make a payment to recognise this.

  • West Northamptonshire Council (24 014 990)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Child protection 07-Apr-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the actions of the Social Worker allocated to her child’s case. The law prevents us from investigating anything that forms part of court proceedings, including information and reports produced for the court. We would expect Ms X to raise any concerns about these issues in court.

  • Birmingham City Council (24 015 083)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Refuse and recycling 07-Apr-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about an alledged failure by the Council to adhere to normal household bin collections over the last few months. This is because the level of injustice to the complainant is insufficient to warrant our involvement.

  • Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council (24 015 669)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Assessment and care plan 07-Apr-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about an alleged failure to apply for NHS Continuing Health Care funding for his relative, Mr Y, in April 2022. An investigation would not achieve a worthwhile outcome or what Mr X wants.

  • Norwich City Council (24 016 943)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Disabled facilities grants 07-Apr-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about the Council’s decision in relation to her request for major adaptations to her home via a Disabled Facilities Grant. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council to warrant an investigation.

  • Lincolnshire County Council (24 017 294)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Assessment and care plan 07-Apr-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about financial assessment for adult social care charges, and the Council’s decision about a deprivation of asset. This is because it is unlikely we would find fault in the Council’s decision-making process or reach a different outcome.

  • Cheshire West & Chester Council (24 017 489)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Child protection 07-Apr-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council substantiating child safeguarding concerns in a matter concerning Mr X. Investigation by us would be unlikely to lead to a finding of fault.

  • Derbyshire County Council (24 017 795)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries School transport 07-Apr-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s decision to refuse his request to provide home to school transport for his child, Y. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault.

  • Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council (24 017 927)

    Statement Upheld Other 07-Apr-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Council’s decision to limit Mr X’s participation in the co-production board. The Council has since met with and written to Mr X to resolve his ongoing concerns.

  • Folkestone & Hythe District Council (24 017 995)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Allocations 07-Apr-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s assessment of the complainant’s priority for housing which allegedly failed to consider her households medical needs. This is because the Council’s housing decision carried a right of review and it would be reasonable for her to have requested this and completed the review process before bringing her complaint to the Ombudsman.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings