Decision search


What's this ?
  • Organisation
  • Decision type

  • Reference number
  • Date range

     

  • Sort Results

Show advanced search

Your search has 54886 results

  • Nottinghamshire County Council (24 010 840)

    Statement Upheld Assessment and care plan 15-May-2025

    Summary: Mrs X complained about the Council’s role in supporting her late mother Mrs Y to move from a care home to live with her in another council’s area. The Council was at fault for poor communication and delay. The Council has agreed to apologise and make a payment to Mrs X to acknowledge the frustration and distress she was caused and pay some of the care fees for the extra weeks Mrs Y remained in the care home due to the Council’s delays and poor communication.

  • Kent County Council (24 022 383)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Child protection 15-May-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s processing of Mrs X’s personal data. This is because these issues are for the Information Commissioner’s Office to consider.

  • Manchester City Council (24 022 775)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Child protection 15-May-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of a safeguarding referral about his family. The law prevents us from investigating anything that is or has been the subject of court proceedings. We are also unlikely to find evidence of fault in the Council’s action following Mr X’s arrest.

  • Lancashire County Council (24 022 828)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Child protection 15-May-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council’s response to her concerns about the care and welfare of her grandchildren. This is because there is no sign of fault in the Council’s decision not to accept her complaint because she does not have parental responsibility for the children.

  • Birmingham City Council (24 022 901)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Highway repair and maintenance 15-May-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about highway maintenance because it is reasonable to expect Mr Y to approach the courts about the matter, who are better placed to consider the complaint.

  • Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council (25 000 470)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Friends and family carers 15-May-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about payment of fostering allowances. This is because the complaint is late, and there is no good reason for the delay in complaining to us.

  • Birmingham City Council (25 001 009)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 15-May-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council not supporting him because there is not enough evidence of fault or significant injustice.

  • Bristol City Council (25 001 808)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 15-May-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a data breach as the Information Commissioner's Office is best placed to assess the Council's response and compensation can be sought in court.

  • London Borough of Bromley (24 011 010)

    Statement Upheld Homelessness 15-May-2025

    Summary: Mr X complained that he remained living in unsuitable temporary accommodation for over 12 months, despite the Council agreeing to move him. He also complained about delay in the Council’s complaints process. We upheld both parts of the complaint, finding the Council at fault for not re-housing Mr X sooner and for delay in responding to his complaint. These faults caused distress to Mr X and meant he lived in unsuitable accommodation for far longer than he should have. The Council has accepted these findings. At the end of this statement, I set out action the Council has agreed to remedy this injustice caused to Mr X and improve its service.

  • Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council (24 011 178)

    Statement Upheld Allocations 15-May-2025

    Summary: Ms C complained that the Council failed to properly consider her medical conditions in refusing her request to bid on bungalows or houses. We found that the Council had not properly considered Ms C’s mental health condition or explained its reasons for discounting the medical evidence provided by her doctors. The Council has agreed to reconsider these points in a further review of her medical needs.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings