South Holland District Council (25 020 135)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 27 Apr 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about a planning decision the Council made, including how it made its decision and the information it used. X has already used an alternative legal remedy to appeal the decision to the Planning Inspector, and the law does not allow us to investigate.

The complaint

  1. X complained about several aspects of the way the Council decided to refuse a planning decision. They said it was procedurally unfair, used inaccurate information and was bias. They said the Council’s actions caused them financial and emotional strain and affected their reputation.
  2. X also said they were unhappy with how the Council handled their complaint about these matters, saying it was ineffective and failed to respond to the issues they raised.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The courts have said that where someone has sought a remedy by way of proceedings in any court of law, we cannot investigate. This is the case even if the appeal did not or could not provide a complete remedy for all the injustice claimed. (R v The Commissioner for Local Administration ex parte PH (1999) EHCA Civ 916)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. X said they were concerned about several aspects of a planning officers report and of their contact with other Council officers. They said the Council’s decisions were illogical when compared with other identical applications, which had been approved.
  2. We cannot investigate this complaint. This is because the actions X complains of relates to a planning decision. That decision has been appealed to the Planning Inspector and the law I have highlighted at paragraph four means we cannot investigate.
  3. Nor will we investigate the Council’s handling of X’s complaint because it is not a good use of public resources to investigate complaint handling, where we are unable to consider the substantive matters.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate X’s complaint because an appeal right has already been used in relation to the substantive decision.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings