South Cambridgeshire District Council (25 011 747)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 08 Dec 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with the discharge of a planning condition in 2025. Mrs X had the right to appeal to the Planning Inspector it would have been reasonable to use.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complained of the way the council dealt with an application to discharge a planning condition in 2025.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a government minister. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b), as amended)
  3. The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of the responsible Government minister. The Planning Inspector considers appeals about:
  • Delay – usually over eight weeks – by an authority in deciding an application for planning permission;
  • A decision to refuse planning permission;
  • Conditions placed on planning permission; and
  • A planning enforcement notice.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
  3. I have not considered matters relating to earlier actions of the Council in 2024 and before that. We have already considered them in complaint 23 019 941.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. A refusal by a planning authority to discharge a planning application carries with it a right of appeal to the Planning Inspector. It would have been reasonable for Mrs X to appeal against a Council decision to refuse the discharge application, so there would be no reason for us to exercise discretion.
  2. The complaint correspondence states Mrs X has used her right of appeal to the Planning Inspector. If that is correct, then we cannot investigate the complaint, and no discretion would be available to us.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because she has a right of appeal it would be reasonable to use.
  2. If Mrs X has used that right of appeal, we cannot investigate her complaint.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings