Cumberland Council (24 022 600)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 08 Jun 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to restrict its contact with a third party in line with its unreasonable customer policy. No restrictions have been placed on the complainant therefore the Council’s actions have not caused the complainant significant injustice.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains the Council has decided the spokesperson for a community group is vexatious. She says this silences the community.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council applied its unreasonable customer policy to designate a third party, whom I shall call Mr Y, as an unreasonably persistent customer. It advised Mr Y it will only accept contact from him in certain ways so it can manage his contacts effectively.
  2. I understand Mrs X considers she has been ‘silenced’ by the Council because of the contact restrictions it has placed on Mr Y. However, I do not agree. Mrs X is not subject to any restrictions and she is free to make a complaint to the Council should she wish to do so.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because we do not consider she has suffered a significant personal injustice because of the Council’s decision to apply its unreasonable complaints policy to Mr Y.

Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings