Buckinghamshire Council (24 022 056)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 08 Oct 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to issue a Certificate of Lawfulness for his neighbour’s dropped kerb. We have not seen enough evidence of fault in the Council’s actions.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council gave a section of highway land to a Council employee to use as her private property.
  2. He says he is deprived of pedestrian access to his drive and created reduced vision splay affecting his property. The paving of the area has also increased flood risk.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X’s neighbour installed a dropped kerb without planning permission. They later applied to the Council for a Certificate of Lawfulness.
  2. The Council confirms the Certificate of Lawfulness is for the dropped kerb only. It allows the kerb to facilitate access to the neighbour’s driveway. It does not allow the neighbour to use highway land for private parking. The Council has advised Mr X to contact the police if the neighbour is blocking the highway.
  3. We have not seen any evidence the Council has given away highway land to Mr X’s neighbour.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s decision to issue a Certificate of Lawfulness to his neighbour.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings