East Suffolk Council (24 021 418)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 01 Apr 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a planning application. This is because we are unlikely to find fault and the complainant has not suffered significant injustice.

The complaint

  1. Mr X has complained about how the Council dealt with a planning application. He says the Council failed to notify residents and he could have lost the opportunity to comment on the proposal.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Councils are required to give publicity to planning applications. The publicity required depends on the nature of the development. However, in all cases the application must be published on the Council’s website.
  2. In this case, the Council says it wrote to the neighbouring resident and erected site notices. Mr X says additional consultation should be carried out for controversial applications. However, I am satisfied the Council publicised the application as required. Furthermore, even if there was fault with how the Council notified residents about the application, I do not consider Mr X has suffered any significant injustice as a result. The application was withdrawn, and planning permission has not been granted for the development.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because we are unlikely to find fault. Mr X has also not suffered any significant injustice.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings