Somerset Council (24 019 476)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 27 Mar 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a planning application. Miss X’s client had the right to appeal to the Planning Inspectorate and it would have been reasonable to expect them to use it if the Council had not now decided the application and issued a decision notice.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complains the Council failed to decide her client’s planning application on time. She complains about the lack of communication since her application was submitted.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a government minister. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X says her client submitted a planning application in spring 2024 and is still waiting for a decision months later. She says she has asked the Council for updates, and it has failed to respond to her on several occasions.
  2. Miss X’s client had the right to appeal to the Planning Inspectorate if the Council had not decided the planning application within eight weeks of validating it. It is reasonable to expect Miss X to have used this right and appeal to the Planning Inspectorate.
  3. Even if the Council had not recently issued a decision notice on the application, therefore, we would not investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because the Council has now issued a decision notice and it would have been reasonable for her client to appeal to the Planning Inspectorate against the delay.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings