Leeds City Council (24 012 767)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 19 Nov 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of a neighbour’s planning application. There is not enough evidence of fault in the actions of the Council to warrant our further involvement.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complained that the Council failed to fully consider her concerns relating to a neighbour’s planning application for building works.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is no enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered:
    • Information provided by the complainant.
    • Documents on the Council’s website about the planning application, including the original and revised plans, and associated reports.
    • The Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We are not an appeal body. This means we do not take a second look at a decision to decide if it was wrong. Instead, we look at the processes an organisation followed to make its decision. If we consider it followed those processes correctly, we cannot question whether the decision was right or wrong.
  2. I find there is insufficient evidence to conclude that any fault has affected the outcome of the planning application, so we will not start an investigation. In reaching this view, I am mindful that:
    • Mrs X submitted comments relating to the original planning application to the Council. This related to the size and scale of the proposed building works, and potential reduction of natural light. The Council’s planning officer report shows that it considered these concerns, and these are evident in the required amendments in the revised plans.
    • The Council does not have to engage in further consultation. This is because it has already reviewed and responded to Mrs X’s concerns.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence that fault is likely to have affected the planning outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings