Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council (24 009 731)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 30 Oct 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of his planning application, which it refused. This is because it would have been reasonable for Mr X to appeal the Council’s decision to the Planning Inspector.

The complaint

  1. Mr X was unhappy the Council refused his planning application. He believed the facts it relied on were inaccurate and it did not meaningfully engage with him on the matter. Mr X also said the Council delayed addressing his complaint to prevent him appealing the matter.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a government minister. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X submitted a planning application to the Council, which it then went on to refuse. Within the Council’s decision notice, it set out how Mr X could appeal this decision to the Planning Inspector if he disagreed. Mr X made a complaint to the Council and then approached us, because he was unhappy with the Council’s explanations for its decisions.
  2. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because where there is a right of appeal about the subject of the complaint, in this instance to refuse planning permission, we expect complainants to use that appeal right. Additionally, it would have been reasonable for Mr X to use this appeal right because he wanted the Council to approve his request and Parliament expressly provided the right of appeal as a means to that end.
  3. Mr X was also unhappy with how the Council dealt with his complaint about these matters. We will not investigate this either, because we do not investigate complaints, where we are not looking at the substantive matters.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because it would have been reasonable for Mr X to appeal against the Council’s decision for refusing his planning application.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings