North Yorkshire Council (24 001 613)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 16 Jun 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about planning delays. We are unlikely to find significant fault or that she has been caused significant injustice which needs a remedy.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X says the Council delayed too long in deciding a planning application and used the wrong part of its policy.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X and the Council’s replies to her complaint.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. In 2021, planning permission was applied for a large domestic development on land next to Mrs X’s home. The application was withdrawn in 2024.
  2. Mrs X says the Council took too long to decide the application. She says this caused her uncertainty and distress. She says she got legal advice about the application. She says the Council used this legal advice and changed the way it considered the application. She says the Council should pay back her legal costs.

Analysis

  1. Large developments can take years to receive full planning permission. Given the application has now been withdrawn, we are unlikely to find the delay caused Mrs X any significant injustice which justifies an investigation.
  2. Mrs X can choose to gain and put in any legal advice when exercising her legal right to object to the planning application. The applicant or Council agreeing with an objector is part of the planning process. We are unlikely to recommend the Council should pay back her legal costs.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because it is unlikely we would find significant fault or that Mrs X has been caused significant injustice because of fault which needs a remedy.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings