Herefordshire Council (23 019 106)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 09 Apr 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to approve a planning application. There is insufficient evidence of fault in the Council’s actions to justify an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complains the Council ignored resident’s objections and local knowledge when it decided to approve a planning application.
  2. She wants the planning permission withdrawn.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Miss X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X says the Council ignored objections and local knowledge when it decided to approve a planning application for a site near her home.
  2. We are not an appeal body and cannot question whether a council’s decision is right or wrong simply because the complainant disagrees with it. We must consider whether there was fault in the way the decision was reached that is likely to have affected the outcome.
  3. A planning officer produced a report which set out the planning issues, including the objections received. It also included the comments from statutory consultees, who did not object to the application. The report details why the officer recommended the Council grant planning permission. The minutes of the Council’s planning committee meeting show the committee members considered the report and heard from people who objected to the application and an individual representing the applicant. A debate took place before the committee members voted to grant conditional planning permission.
  4. I appreciate Miss X may disagree with the Council’s decision, but I have seen nothing to suggest fault in how in how it was made.
  5. Miss X says the Council ignored the opposition to the proposal. However, the Council can only consider any planning issues, regardless of the strength of local opposition. The officer report addressed the planning issues raised by local people and other bodies. I have seen no evidence of fault in the way the Council addressed these concerns.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault in the Council’s decision-making process.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings