South Ribble Borough Council (23 018 998)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 29 Feb 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with the complainant’s planning application. This is because the complainant has the right to appeal to the Planning Inspector.

The complaint

  1. Mr X has complained about how the Council dealt with his planning application. He says the Council’s actions have affected his health and he has suffered financial losses.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a government minister. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b), as amended)
  3. The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of the responsible Government minister. The Planning Inspector considers appeals about:
  • Delay – usually over eight weeks – by an authority in deciding an application for planning permission
  • A decision to refuse planning permission
  • Conditions placed on planning permission
  • A planning enforcement notice.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X says his complaint is not about the Council’s decision to refuse planning permission. Instead, his concerns relate to how the application was dealt with and the behaviour of the planning officers. However, the Ombudsman must consider the personal injustice that may have arisen as a direct result of any alleged fault. The substantive injustice in this case is that the Council refused Mr X’s application. I consider it unlikely Mr X would have raised his concerns had his application been approved. Mr X can seek a remedy for the substantive injustice by appealing to the Planning Inspector and I consider it reasonable for him to use this appeal right. The Ombudsman will not usually investigate when someone has a right to appeal to the Planning Inspector, even if the appeal will not address all the issues complained about.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because he has the right to appeal to the Planning Inspector.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings