City of Doncaster Council (23 018 110)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 16 Feb 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate Mr B’s complaint about the Council’s refusal of his planning application because he appealed to the Planning Inspector. Also, it is reasonable for Mr B to put in an appeal to the Planning Inspector if the Council takes enforcement action.

The complaint

  1. Mr B complains the Council wrongly refused his retrospective planning application for a wall he built. Mr B also complains the Council is now threatening planning enforcement action. Mr B says he has been treated unfairly because there are similar walls nearby which the Council has not taken action about.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a government minister. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b), as amended)
  3. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has already appealed to a government minister. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b), as amended)
  4. The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of the responsible Government minister. The Planning Inspector considers appeals about:
  • A decision to refuse planning permission
  • A planning enforcement notice.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr B.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr B put in an appeal to the Planning Inspector against the Council’s refusal of his planning application to keep the wall he built. Because Mr B appealed to the Planning Inspector, this means we cannot investigate his complaint about the Council’s refusal of his planning application.
  2. Mr B also complains the Council is now threatening planning enforcement action. If the Council issues Mr B with a planning enforcement notice, Mr B will have a right of appeal to the Planning Inspector.
  3. I find it is reasonable for Mr B to use this right of appeal. The Planning Inspector is independent and, unlike the Ombudsman, has the power to vary or cancel the requirements of a planning enforcement notice.
  4. So, we will not investigate Mr B’s complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate the Council’s decision on Mr B’s planning application because he appealed to the Planning Inspector. It is reasonable for Mr B to put in an appeal to the Planning Inspector if the Council issues an enforcement notice.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings