Birmingham City Council (23 015 201)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 29 Feb 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to grant planning permission for a household extension. There is insufficient evidence of fault in the Council’s decision-making process to justify an investigation. Nor can we achieve the outcome the complainant is seeking.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council failed to protect his property when considering his neighbour’s planning application. He says the Council:
    • is colluding with his neighbour;
    • accepted plans not to scale;
    • failed to enforce its own policy; and
    • altered a planning report after publication.
  2. He wants the
    • planning permission withdrawn; and
    • Council officers involved in the decision to grant planning permission dismissed.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered all the information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. I have reviewed all the information provided by Mr X. I have also considered the information provided by the Council and the information about the planning application which is available on the Council’s website.
  2. The Council publicised the planning application. The planning officer’s report contains details of the application, the relevant Council policies and explains why the application was considered acceptable.
  3. I have seen no evidence that the report was altered after the decision was made.
  4. Mr X wants Council officers dismissed. This is not something the Ombudsman can achieve.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because we have not seen evidence of fault in the way the Council processed his neighbour’s planning application. Also, we cannot dismiss Council employees which is part of the outcome Mr X is seeking.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings