City of York Council (23 002 531)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 14 Jun 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a planning application. This is because the complaint is late.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I shall refer to as Mr X, has complained about how the Council dealt with his neighbour’s planning application. Mr X says the Council did not follow the proper procedures and failed to properly assess the application. He says there were errors in the case officer’s report and his objections were not considered before planning permission was granted. Mr X has also complained the Council did not respond to his correspondence or properly communicate with him.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X has raised many concerns about how the Council dealt with his neighbour’s planning application and its decision to grant planning permission. However, I consider his complaint about these matters late.
  2. A complaint is late if it has taken someone more than 12 months to complain to the Ombudsman. The Council granted planning permission for the development in 2021. Mr X knew about the application at the time and was also aware of the issues he has complained about. I understand Mr X says the matter has been ongoing and he was waiting for responses from the Council. But I see no good reason to exercise discretion to investigate as I consider Mr X could have complained to the Ombudsman sooner.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because his complaint is late.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings