East Hampshire District Council (22 017 804)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 11 Jun 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a planning application. This is because the complaint does not meet the tests in our Assessment Code on how we decide which complaints to investigate. The complaint is late and there is no good reason to exercise discretion in this case.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, I shall call Ms X, says that when approving a planning application, the Council:
    • failed to preserve and enhance the natural beauty
    • failed to consider the wildlife and cultural heritage; and
    • failed to promote opportunities for public understanding and enjoyment of the special quality of the area where she lives.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Ms X.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council received a planning application in 2021. Ms X and others objected to the proposal. Having reviewed the material planning considerations, the Council decided to approve the application. Ms X was aware of this in 2021.
  2. We will not investigate this complaint because it is late. Late complaints are when someone takes more than twelve months to complain to us. The issue at the core of Ms X’s complaint occurred in 2021. I have seen no good reason to investigate this now.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because it is made too late and there are no good reasons to exercise discretion.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings