Wealden District Council (22 017 353)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 23 Mar 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint that the Council has delayed deciding his planning application. This is because it is reasonable for Mr B to put in an appeal to the Planning Inspector.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I will refer to as Mr B, complains the Council has delayed deciding his planning application. Mr B says the Council asked several times for unnecessary time extensions and the application should have been approved seven months ago. Mr B says the delay is costing his business a significant amount of money. Mr B would like the Council to grant his application planning permission.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The Act says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a government minister. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b))
  3. The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of the responsible Government minister. The Planning Inspector considers appeals about:
    • Delay – usually over eight weeks – by an authority in deciding an application for planning permission
  • A decision to refuse planning permission
  • Conditions placed on planning permission
  • A planning enforcement notice.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr B.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Most planning applications should be decided within eight weeks, although the time limit is 13 weeks for major applications. If the planning application has not been decided by the end of this period, and an extension has not been agreed in writing, the applicant can appeal to the Planning Inspector.
  2. Mr B could have put in an appeal to the Planning Inspector if he considered the Council’s earlier requests for extensions were not justified. Mr B has not agreed to the Council’s most recent request for an extension, so it remains open to him to put in an appeal to the Planning Inspector now.
  3. I find it is reasonable for Mr B to do this, particularly because the Planning Inspector has the power to grant planning permission.
  4. So, we will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint because it is reasonable for him to put in an appeal to the Planning Inspector.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings