Torridge District Council (22 010 452)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 21 Nov 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of a planning application. This is because the Council’s actions have not caused Mr X significant injustice and we cannot achieve the outcome he wants.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Mr X, complains about the Council’s handling of an application for development near his home. He believes the application should be invalid as the applicant has not paid the required fee or provided the correct certification.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. It is not our role to determine the validity of the application and we cannot say the Council must delay or defer its decision until it resolves Mr X’s concerns, as Mr X would like.
  2. The Council has not yet made any decision on the application so it actions, whether fault or not, have not caused Mr X significant injustice. The Council will determine the application on its merits and we cannot provide a remedy for an injustice that has not yet taken place.
  3. If the Council decides to grant planning permission, and if Mr X believes it has failed to properly consider the proposal, he may raise a new complaint. Once Mr X has exhausted the Council’s complaints procedure, and if he remains unhappy, he may refer the complaint to us to consider.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because the Council’s actions have not caused Mr X significant injustice and we cannot achieve the outcome Mr X wants.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings