Dartmoor National Park Authority (22 008 735)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 16 Oct 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the way the Council reached its decision on possible enforcement action for an alleged breach of planning control concerning her property. This is because any injustice stems from the decision itself and if Mrs X disagrees with any enforcement notice the Council issues, it would be reasonable for her to appeal to the Planning Inspectorate.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Mrs X, complains the Council made a decision on a planning enforcement matter at a committee meeting held in private. She says the Council has refused to release any details from the meeting and she is concerned about the possibility of the Council taking enforcement action against her.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a government minister. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b))
  3. The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of the responsible Government minister. The Planning Inspector considers appeals about:
  • delay – usually over eight weeks – by an authority in deciding an application for planning permission
  • a decision to refuse planning permission
  • conditions placed on planning permission
  • a planning enforcement notice.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Although Mrs X complains about the way in which the Council made its decision this issue carries no significant injustice which is separate from the decision it reached. If the Council decided not to take enforcement action then the fact it met in private would not affect Mrs X. If the Council decided to take enforcement action and Mrs X believes the decision was not properly reached, Mrs X may appeal.
  2. It is unclear at what stage the Council’s enforcement case is currently but until the Council issues an enforcement notice Mrs X does not need to take any further action. Once it issues an enforcement notice, and if Mrs X believes the enforcement notice is flawed or the decision to issue it was not made properly, Mrs X may appeal to the Planning Inspectorate. The Planning Inspectorate is the appropriate body to decide disputes about the issue of enforcement notices and its decisions are binding on both parties.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because the substantive issue concerns whether the Council is correct to take formal enforcement action against Mrs X and it would be reasonable for her to put the matter to the Planning Inspectorate as part of an appeal.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings