Leeds City Council (22 003 040)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 16 Jun 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of his neighbour’s planning application. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Mr X, complains the Council failed to comply with its planning guidance in granting planning permission for his neighbour’s development. He disagrees with the officer’s judgement and says the Council has not properly explained the reasons for departing from its guidance.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We cannot question whether an organisation’s decision is right or wrong simply because the complainant disagrees with it. We must consider whether there was fault in the way the decision was reached. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Councils must take account of relevant policies and guidance in determining applications for planning permission but should not refuse applications simply because they fail to comply. It must consider the impact of the proposal and make decisions on a case-by-case basis.
  2. Mr X’s neighbour applied for planning permission and their proposal did not meet a key policy regarding the relationship between the application site and Mr X’s home. The Council therefore considered the extent of the breach and its impact on Mr X’s property. Having done so it decided the impact of the breach was not significant enough to warrant refusal and granted permission for it.
  3. While Mr X disagrees with the decision and says the Council has not explained the reasons for approving the application I do not agree. The planning officer’s report clearly sets out the officer’s rationale behind the decision and it is not for us to question it. I appreciate Mr X would have liked his neighbour to amend their plans but the Council determined the proposal was acceptable and there was therefore no basis for it to require changes.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings