Leicester City Council (21 014 917)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 04 Feb 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a failure to tell the complainant about a planning application. There is no evidence of fault in the way the Council publicised the application.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, I shall call Mr J says the Council failed to tell him about an application to erect a 20-metre high, 5G mast on a road near his home.
  2. He says the mast ‘looms’ over his home and he wants it removed.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We cannot question whether a council’s decision is right or wrong simply because the complainant disagrees with it. We must consider whether there was fault in the way the decision was reached. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr J.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Planning authorities must publicise all planning applications. Depending on the nature of the development, publication may be by newspaper advertisement and / or site notice and / or neighbour notification (The Town and Country Planning (General Development Procedure) Order 1995.) The notice will invite ‘representations’ for or against the application and explain how those representations may be made.
  2. The Council’s Statement of Community Involvement says it will place a site notice near application sites and write to the occupiers or owners of property which adjoin those sites.
  3. Although the mast is visible from Mr J’s home, it is located in the central reservation of the next road. The Council says it placed a site notice close to the application site.
  4. I understand Mr J believes there was a moral duty to write to him about the application. But his property does not adjoin the site. It is clear the Council met its statutory obligations for publicising the application. I cannot criticise the Council’s actions as there is no evidence of fault in the statutory process.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr J’s complaint because there is no evidence of fault in the way the Council publicised the planning application.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings