Arun District Council (21 014 534)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 07 Feb 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Ms X complains about the grant of planning permission for a building at the end of their neighbour’s garden. We will not investigate this complaint because there is no evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains about the grant of planning permission for a building at the end of their neighbour’s garden.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • any fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained, or
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
  3. I considered the complainant’s comments on my draft decision.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. A planning application for a single storey garden annexe was made in April 2021. Ms X objected and the Planning Officer report considered those objections.
  2. The Planning Officer had before them the scaled plans and dimensions of the annexe and the position in relation to Ms X’s house. The Planning Officer concluded that a similar building could be erected without the need for planning permission (Permitted Development). The lack of separate access and the lack of significant effect upon Ms X’s amenity persuaded the Planning Officer that planning permission should be granted.
  3. I am satisfied that the Planning Officer had before them all the facts necessary to make a decision on the merit of the planning application itself. In the absence of any administrative fault, the Ombudsman would not be able to question the professional judgement of the Planning Officer and the Council.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I do not intend to investigate this complaint because there is no evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings