Cornwall Council (21 013 611)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 02 Feb 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Mr X complains about the Council’s refusal to take planning enforcement action against a neighbour’s garage. We will not investigate this complaint because there is no evidence of fault.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about the Council’s refusal to take planning enforcement action against a neighbour’s garage.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We cannot question whether a council’s decision is right or wrong simply because the complainant disagrees with it. We must consider whether there was fault in the way the decision was reached. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
  3. I considered the complainant’s comments on my draft decision.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X’s neighbour built a garage which Mr X says is too big and reduces light to his property.
  2. The Council says that the garage would need planning permission. However, they say that part of the building would benefit from Permitted Development if built on its own.
  3. The planning enforcement process we expect is as follows. We expect councils to consider allegations and decide what, if any, investigation is necessary. If the council decides there is a breach of control, it must consider what harm is caused to the public before deciding how to react. Providing the council is aware of its powers and follows this process, it is free to make its own judgement on how or whether to act.
  4. A Planning Officer visited the site and measured the garage (and took photographs). The Council concluded that the building would receive planning permission if a retrospective planning application were to be submitted. This was because the loss of light was not significant
  5. I am satisfied that a Planning Officer properly assessed the matter, and, in the absence of administrative fault, the Ombudsman cannot question the professional judgement of the Planning Officer.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I do not intend to investigate this complaint because there is no evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings