City of Wolverhampton Council (21 011 739)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 04 Jan 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Mr X complains about the Council’s grant of planning permission for a neighbour’s extension. We will not investigate this complaint because there is no evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about the Council’s grant of planning permission for a neighbour’s extension.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We cannot question whether a council’s decision is right or wrong simply because the complainant disagrees with it. We must consider whether there was fault in the way the decision was reached. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)
  2. We have the power to start or discontinue an investigation into a complaint within our jurisdiction. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we think the issues could reasonably be, or have been, raised within a court of law. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 24A(6) and 34B(8), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
  3. I considered the complainant’s comments on my draft decision.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X’s neighbour submitted a planning application in 2021 for a first floor extension. The Council considered the objections to the planning application but granted planning permission.
  2. Mr X says that the planning application should not have been validated because it expressed an error about ownership of a tree on the border.
  3. The Council says that the error was not so significant as to nullify the planning application. I am satisfied that the Council reached this decision without administrative fault and so the Ombudsman cannot question the Council’s professional judgement.
  4. Further, any damage to a tree by a neighbour could be remedied by private legal action for damages. Planning permission does not provide the recipient of the right to damage another’s property.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I do not intend to investigate this complaint because there is no evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings