Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames (21 011 635)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 18 Nov 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate Mr B’s complaint about the Council’s refusal of his planning application. This is because Mr B appealed to the planning inspector against the Council’s decision.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I will refer to as Mr B, complains about the Council’s handling of his planning application. Mr B says the Council was wrong to refuse his planning application and there was inadequate communication before the Council made this decision. Mr B says because of the Council’s refusal of his application he will have to pay higher costs for construction materials in addition to his appeal costs. Mr B also says this delay getting planning permission has caused him stress and inconvenience. Mr B would like the Council to discipline the officer involved and pay him compensation.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a government minister. The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of a government minister. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b), as amended)
  3. The Planning Inspector considers appeals about:
  • delay – usually over eight weeks – by an authority in deciding an application for planning permission
  • a decision to refuse planning permission
  • conditions placed on planning permission
  • a planning enforcement notice.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr B.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr B put in an appeal to the planning inspector against the Council’s refusal of his planning application. The planning inspector granted Mr B’s application planning permission.
  2. Because Mr B used his right of appeal to the planning inspector we have no discretion to investigate his complaint about the Council’s refusal of his planning application. Mr B says he has incurred additional costs because of the delay getting planning permission. But, the courts have decided this restriction applies even if the appeal could not provide a remedy for all the claimed injustice.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate Mr B’s complaint because he used his right of appeal to the planning inspector.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings