London Borough of Richmond upon Thames (21 010 534)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 16 Nov 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with the complainant’s planning applications. This is because the complainant had the right to appeal to the Planning Inspector.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I shall refer to as Mrs X, has complained about how the Council dealt with her planning applications. She says the Council incorrectly advised her regarding the type of application she would need to make, and this led to the applications being refused. Mrs X also disagrees with the Council’s decisions to refuse planning permission and says it should approve the applications and compensate her.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a government minister. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b))
  3. The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of the responsible Government minister. The Planning Inspector considers appeals about:
  • delay – usually over eight weeks – by an authority in deciding an application for planning permission
  • a decision to refuse planning permission
  • conditions placed on planning permission
  • a planning enforcement notice.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X could have appealed to the Planning Inspector if she was unhappy with the Council’s decisions to refuse her planning applications. She can also appeal to the Inspector if she disagrees with the enforcement notice recently issued by the Council.
  2. I consider it would have been reasonable for Mrs X to have used her right of appeal. The Ombudsman will not usually investigate when someone had a right to appeal, even if the appeal would not have addressed all the issues complained about.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because it would have been reasonable for her to use her right of appeal to the Planning Inspectorate.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings