Cheshire West & Chester Council (21 009 681)
Category : Planning > Planning applications
Decision : Closed after initial enquiries
Decision date : 26 Oct 2021
The Ombudsman's final decision:
Summary: We will not investigate Miss B’s complaint about the Council’s handling of her planning applications. This is because Miss B has either used her right of appeal to the planning inspector or it is reasonable for her to do so.
The complaint
- The complainant, who I will refer to as Miss B, complains about the Council’s handling of her planning applications. Miss B says in 2020 the Council wrongly refused a planning application she put in, which meant she had to appeal to the planning inspector to get planning permission. Miss B also says the Council has still not decided her planning application made in May this year. Miss B says the Council has told her it is likely to refuse again without giving a proper explanation. Miss B also says the Council has ignored a request from her local councillor for the application to be decided by the Council’s planning committee. Miss B says the Council has caused her a lot of stress and anxiety, in addition to her planning costs.
The Ombudsman’s role and powers
- The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
- The Act says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a government minister. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b))
- We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has already appealed to a government minister.
- The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of the responsible Government minister. The Planning Inspector considers appeals about:
- delay – usually over eight weeks – by an authority in deciding an application for planning permission
- a decision to refuse planning permission
- conditions placed on planning permission
- a planning enforcement notice.
How I considered this complaint
- I considered information provided by Miss B and planning records available online.
- I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
- Miss B had the opportunity to comment on a draft version of this statement.
My assessment
- We cannot investigate Miss B’s complaint about the Council’s refusal of her first planning application. This is because Miss B used her right of appeal to the planning inspector. This means we have no discretion to investigate the Council’s handling of this application.
- We will not investigate Miss B’s complaint about the Council’s handling of her recent planning application which has not been decided by the Council yet. This is because Miss B has a right of appeal to the planning inspector against the Council’s delay deciding the application. I find it is reasonable for Miss B to use this right of appeal. Miss B says she does not trust the Council to decide her application fairly. The planning inspector is independent and has the power to grant planning permission. Also, Miss B may put in a claim for her appeal costs to the planning inspector.
Final decision
- We will not investigate this complaint. This is because we cannot investigate Miss B’s complaint about the Council’s decision on her first planning application. Also, it is reasonable for Miss B to appeal to the planning inspector against the Council’s delay deciding her second application.
Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman