Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council (21 007 593)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 04 Jan 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Mr X complains about the grant of planning permission for a neighbour’s extension and lack of enforcement action by the Council. We will not investigate this complaint because the planning permission is out of time and there is no fault in the way the Council has considered enforcement action.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about the grant of planning permission for a neighbour’s extension and lack of enforcement action by the Council.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)
  2. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We cannot question whether a council’s decision is right or wrong simply because the complainant disagrees with it. We must consider whether there was fault in the way the decision was reached. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
  3. I considered the complainant’s comments on my draft decision.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X’s neighbour was granted planning permission in 2018 for a single storey extension. Whilst Mr X is unhappy with the decision, I see no reason why a complaint about the planning permission could not have been made to this office within 12 months. The planning permission is therefore out of jurisdiction.
  2. Mr X says that the extension has not been built in accordance with planning permission.
  3. The Council says that a Planning Officer visited and they are satisfied that the height of the extension has been measured and complies with planning permission.
  4. The Council says that the render used does not comply with the planning permission and the Council is now considering whether enforcement action should be taken.
  5. I am satisfied that the Council has properly considered their powers of enforcement in this matter. In the absence of fault, the Ombudsman would not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I do not intend to investigate this complaint because part of the complaint is out of time and there is no evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings