London Borough of Croydon (21 007 012)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 12 Jan 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of a planning matter involving encroachment onto Mrs X’s land. This is because there is no evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Mrs X, complains the Council granted planning permission for an extension which encroaches onto her property. She also complains it has failed to take enforcement action and that her neighbour has removed her fence and hedge.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. As part of Mrs X’s neighbour’s planning application the neighbour signed a declaration stating they owned all of the land involved in the application. The grant of planning permission shows the Council considered the development to be acceptable in planning terms but did not give Mrs X’s neighbour any rights to build on Mrs X’s land. If Mrs X believes her neighbour’s extension encroaches onto her land she may wish to seek legal advice; it is not the Council’s role to deal with boundary disputes.
  2. The Council confirms it has opened an enforcement case to investigate other breaches of planning control by Mrs X’s neighbour and while Mrs X is unhappy it has invited her neighbour to submit a new application this is in-line with national guidance and is not fault.
  3. The Council has also explained that removal of Mrs X’s fence and hedge are not planning matters and do not require planning permission. Mrs X may wish to seek further legal advice on these points.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because there is no evidence of fault by the Council. Mrs X’s injustice stems from the actions of her neighbour and not the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings