London Borough of Hillingdon (21 003 490)
Category : Planning > Planning applications
Decision : Closed after initial enquiries
Decision date : 22 Jul 2021
The Ombudsman's final decision:
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council deciding to grant planning permission for development next to the complainant’s home. This is because the complaint does not meet the tests in our Assessment Code on how we decide which complaints to investigate. There is nothing to suggest fault affected the Council’s decision.
The complaint
- Mr B has complained the Council has granted planning permission for development near his. He is particularly worried about the impact of the development on sunlight and daylight reaching his home.
The Ombudsman’s role and powers
- We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’ which we call ‘fault’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if, for example, we believe it is unlikely we would find fault. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
- We do not provide a right of appeal against a council’s decision on a planning application. We cannot question whether a council’s decision is right or wrong simply because the complainant disagrees with it. We must consider whether there was fault in the way the decision was reached that is likely to have affected the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)
How I considered this complaint
- I considered information provided by Mr B which included the Council’s response to his concerns. I have also seen information on the Council’s website. I considered our Assessment Code.
Assessment
- The Council received a planning application for development next to Mr B’s home. It had to consider the planning merits of the application and grant planning permission if there were no valid grounds for refusal.
- The Council publicised the application and Mr B sent his comments on it. A planning officer set out the planning issues in a report which addressed the issues Mr B had raised. The Council decided there were no valid grounds to refuse the application and so granted planning permission.
Final decision
- I have decided we will not investigate this complaint. While I recognise Mr B disagrees with the Council’s decision, we do not provide a right of appeal against it. I have seen nothing to suggest fault in how the Council considered the planning application and, in the absence of fault, cannot question its decision to grant planning permission.
Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman
Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman