Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council (21 002 724)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 19 Jul 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Ms X complains of inconsistency by the Council in the way they dealt with her planning application. We will not investigate this complaint because she could appeal to a Planning Inspector.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains of inconsistency by the Council in the way they dealt with her planning application.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a government minister. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b))
  2. The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of the responsible Government minister. The Planning Inspector considers appeals about:
  • delay – usually over eight weeks – by an authority in deciding an application for planning permission
  • a decision to refuse planning permission
  • conditions placed on planning permission
  • a planning enforcement notice.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
  3. The complainant has had an opportunity to comment on my draft decision.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X made a planning application for an extension to her house. The Council advised that the planning application would be unacceptable unless she reduced the size of the proposed extension. Ms X altered her plans and the planning application was granted.
  2. Ms X says that her neighbour obtained planning permission for an extension similar to her original plans which she says is inconsistent. The Council says that the neighbouring extension, whilst slightly bigger than normally allowed, was not so big as to warrant refusal.
  3. The Ombudsman would not investigate a complaint about the merit of a planning application as there is a right of appeal to a Planning Inspector. Ms X could have pursued her original proposed plans and, if refused, could have appealed to a Planning Inspector.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I do not intend to investigate this complaint because he could, ultimately, have appealed to a Planning Inspector.
     

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings