Sheffield City Council (21 001 577)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 09 Aug 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Ms X complains about the Council’s decision not to notify her of amended plans to a planning application. We will not investigate this complaint because there is no evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains about the Council’s decision not to notify her of amended plans to a planning application.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We cannot question whether a council’s decision is right or wrong simply because the complainant disagrees with it. We must consider whether there was fault in the way the decision was reached. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
  3. The complainant has commented on my draft decision.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X’s neighbour submitted a planning application in October 2020 for a garage close to Ms X’s property. Ms X objected to the planning application on the grounds that it would affect her amenity in terms of loss of light and privacy.
  2. Amended plans were submitted but Ms X was not told of this and the Council then granted planning permission. The Council says that they have discretion as to whether to re-notify neighbours of amended plans. They say that they did not do so in this case as the amended plans would cause less loss of amenity to Ms X.
  3. The original plans showed the garage as 6.5m high and 3m distance from to the boundary. The amended plans showed a height of 3.2m high at the boundary rising to 6.8m at 7m from the boundary.
  4. The Council has a discretion as to whether or not to re-notify neighbours of amended plans. I am satisfied that they properly considered that discretion.
  5. The Planning Officer report clearly refers to the effect upon their property and the basis of the conclusion to grant planning permission. I am satisfied that the planning application was properly considered.
  6. In the absence of fault, the Ombudsman may not criticise that decision.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I do not intend to investigate this complaint because there is no evidence of fault.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings