Swale Borough Council (21 001 238)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 06 Sep 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Mr X complains about the Council’s grant of planning permission for a neighbour’s outbuilding. We will not investigate this complaint because there is no evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about the Council’s grant of planning permission for a neighbour’s outbuilding.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We cannot question whether a council’s decision is right or wrong simply because the complainant disagrees with it. We must consider whether there was fault in the way the decision was reached. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
  3. I have considered Mr X’s comments on the draft decision.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X’s neighbour submitted a planning application for a replacement shed. He says that the shed is too big and it obstructs his access.
  2. The Council granted planning permission after the Planning Officer considered that the shed, whilst larger then the previous shed, was of an acceptable scale and complied with Council policy.
  3. The Planning Officer accepted that the shed would affect Mr X’s view but concluded that any other shed would have the same effect and the loss of view is not a planning consideration which could warrant refusal. The Planning Officer decided that the impact of the shed would not cause a loss of amenity to Mr X from either overlooking or loss of privacy.
  4. I am satisfied that the Council properly considered the effect upon Mr X’s amenity for the planning application. Mr X's dissatisfaction lies with the merits of the Council's decision but, in the absence of fault, the Ombudsman cannot criticise the Council's decision.
  5. Any access issues are a private matter and not a planning consideration.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I do not intend to investigate this complaint because there is no evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings