Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council (20 010 441)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 15 Feb 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Mr X complains about the way the Council considered his planning application. We will not investigate this complaint because this is a matter for the Planning Inspector.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about the way the Council considered his planning application.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a government minister. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b))
  2. The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of the responsible Government minister. The Planning Inspector considers appeals about:
  • delay – usually over eight weeks – by an authority in deciding an application for planning permission
  • a decision to refuse planning permission
  • conditions placed on planning permission
  • a planning enforcement notice.
  1. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a government minister. The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of a government minister. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered the comments of the complainant and the Council and the complainant has commented on the draft decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mr X made a planning application in January 2020 for a change of use and retrospective planning permission for garden decking. The planning application was refused and he appealed to a Planning Inspector. The Planning Inspector upheld the refusal of the retrospective planning application and he says the decking has been removed. The change of use planning application was referred back to the Council.
  2. He says that the Council threatened him with an enforcement notice despite their failure to determine his application. The Council says that he could make a application for the Certificate of Lawful Use to ensure that what has been built has planning authorization.
  3. Any Enforcement notice can be appealed to a Planning Inspector. I appreciate that Mr X is unhappy with what he considers unreasonable threats, but the Ombudsman cannot determine whether enforcement action is appropriate or not.
  4. If Mr X wishes to seek certainty to his current position he may make an application for a Certificate of Lawful Use.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I do not intend to investigate this complaint because there will be a right of appeal to a Planning Inspector.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings